What SB 1092 does

An act to add Sections 798.11.1 and 798.11.2 to, to add Article 7.5 (commencing with Section 798.83.1) to Chapter 2.5 of Title 2 of Part 2 of Division 2 of, and to repeal Section 798.80 of, the Civil Code, relating to mobilehome parks.

Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, requires the owner of a mobilehome park who lists for sale or offers to sell the mobilehome park to any party to provide written notice of the owner’s intention to sell the mobilehome park to a resident organization formed by homeowners for purposes of converting the mobilehome park to condominium or stock cooperative ownership interests and for purchasing the mobilehome park, subject to specified conditions.

This bill would repeal those provisions and would instead require management of a mobilehome park to give notice to each resident household in the park, resident organization, as defined, and specified public entities, as provided, if certain events demonstrating management’s intent to sell occur, subject to specified exceptions. If that event is the receipt of an offer for the sale or transfer the park that management intends to accept or the conditional acceptance of an offer for the sale or transfer of the park, the bill would require the notice to include a statement from management that it has received an offer for sale, lease, or transfer of the park that it intends to accept, a statement of the homeowners’ rights under the bill and the deadlines for exercising those rights, and the price, terms, and conditions of the offer management has conditionally accepted or plans to accept.

This bill would authorize a resident organization or its assignee, to, no later than 120 days after notice of an offer that management intends to accept or conditional acceptance of an offer is sent, deliver a good faith, written purchase offer for the park to management, along with a statement that the homeowners of more than 50% of the mobilehomes in the park support the purchase offer. This bill would require management to consider the resident organization’s proposed purchase offer and negotiate with the resident organization in good faith to determine whether a mutual agreement can be reached that results in the resident organization purchasing the park, and, if the offer is rejected, provide a good faith reason for the rejection. This bill would, if the resident organization’s proposed purchase agreement matches the price and substantially the same terms and conditions as the offer management has conditionally accepted or plans to accept, grant the resident organization the right to purchase the park at the price, terms, and conditions stated in its proposed purchase agreement. The bill would provide specified requirements and restrictions on management and the resident organization with regard to the proposed purchase agreement.

This bill would authorize a resident organization that represents 50% or more of the homeowners of the mobilehome park to, at its election and subject to rescission at any time, assign its rights under the bill to the municipality in which the resident organization is located, a housing authority located in the municipality, a state agency, or a qualified entity for the purpose of continuing the use of the property as a park. The bill would require the Department of Housing and Community Development to establish a process for certifying specified entities as qualified entities, as provided, and to maintain and update annually a list of qualified entities to be made available to management for the purpose of distributing notices to qualified entities.

This bill would authorize a resident organization or public prosecutor, as specified, to bring an action against management that violates the bill for specified civil penalties and other relief. The bill would provide that its provisions shall be interpreted liberally and are severable.

Summary from the Legislative Counsel's Digest of the amended assembly text, June 15, 2026. Read the full text on leginfo.

How it got here

Senator Allen introduced SB 1092 on February 13, 2026, with coauthors Senator Wahab. The text was amended 3 times, 1 in the Assembly and 2 in the Senate, and heard in 6 committee hearings before its final floor votes.

  • Senate Floor, May 26, 2026: 29 ayes, 7 noes.

Committee votes along the way:

  • Senate Judiciary, April 7, 2026: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Housing], 10-2.
  • Senate Housing, April 21, 2026: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations], 8-1.
  • Senate Appropriations, May 11, 2026: Placed on suspense file, 7-0.
  • Senate Appropriations, May 14, 2026: Do pass, 5-2.
  • Assembly Housing and Community Development, June 24, 2026: Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary], 6-4.
  • Assembly Housing and Community Development, July 1, 2026: Reconsideration., 8-0.
  • Assembly Housing and Community Development, July 1, 2026: Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary], 7-5.

Who supports and opposes SB 1092

The Assembly Housing and Community Development analysis dated June 22, 2026 lists 37 organizations in support and 3 in opposition. When Senate Judiciary first listed positions on April 3, 2026, the count was 25 in support and 2 opposed. By the Assembly Housing and Community Development analysis of June 22, 2026 it was 37 to 3.

In support: ROC USA (sponsor); Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services, INC (sponsor); California Coalition for Rural Housing (sponsor); All Home; California Center for Cooperative Development; California Coalition for Community Investment; California Community Land Trust Network; California Housing Partnership; and 29 more.

Opposed: California Association of Realtors; California Mobilehome Parkowners Alliance; Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association.

Read the Assembly Housing and Community Development analysis.

What happens next

It is in the Assembly, its second house. The last recorded action was on July 1, 2026.

The Governor can sign the bill, veto it, or let it become law without a signature. Until the decision, sign and veto request letters are the remaining channel, and the Department of Finance's enrolled bill report carries weight on anything with a fiscal effect. If signed, most provisions take effect January 1, and implementation moves to the agencies named in the bill.

What it means for housing organizations

This is the stage where language still changes. Amendments taken in committee are the ones that reach the Governor, so an organization with a stake in the drafting has a reason to be in that conversation now rather than after the vote.

The housing group at Capitol Axis handles that for housing clients.

Questions about SB 1092

What does SB 1092 do?

This bill would repeal those provisions and would instead require management of a mobilehome park to give notice to each resident household in the park, resident organization, as defined, and specified public entities, as provided, if certain events demonstrating management’s intent to sell occur, subject to specified exceptions. If that event is the receipt of an offer for the sale or transfer the park that management intends to accept or the conditional acceptance of an offer for the sale or transfer of the park, the bill would require the notice to include a statement from management that i

Has SB 1092 passed the California Legislature?

It is in the Assembly, its second house. The last recorded action was on July 1, 2026.

Who supports and opposes SB 1092?

The Assembly Housing and Community Development analysis dated June 22, 2026 lists 37 organizations in support and 3 in opposition. Supporters include ROC USA (sponsor); Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services, INC (sponsor); California Coalition for Rural Housing (sponsor). Opponents include California Association of Realtors; California Mobilehome Parkowners Alliance; Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association.

What happens next with SB 1092?

It still has committee and floor votes ahead of it. Amendments taken now are the ones that reach the Governor, so this is the stage where language changes are still possible.